Scales · Ratings · Distributions

Scales and ratings: measure agreement instead of guessing it

“How strongly do you agree?” — answered on a scale, that produces a distribution rather than a gut feeling. Several statements on the same scale, a mean per statement, your own labels on the endpoints. For retrospectives, feedback and every question whose answer is a degree, not an either/or.

No credit card · Free self-hosting · Open source (AGPLv3)

Retrospective · 3 statementsScale 1–5
We have enough time for focused workMean 2.3
9
14
7
4
2
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

2 × skipped — its own outcome, excluded from the mean.

Priorities are clearMean 3.3
3
6
10
12
5
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

1 × skipped — its own outcome, excluded from the mean.

Handovers work reliablyMean 2.9
5
8
11
7
3
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

4 × skipped — its own outcome, excluded from the mean.

Sample session · not real data

Participant view

We have enough time for focused work

Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

Priorities are clear

Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

Handovers work reliably

Strongly disagreeStrongly agree
Join with

418 302

Scale 1–5Every statement on a slide shares the same scale and the same endpoint labels.

What the scales slide does

One scale, several statements, one clear picture

  • Your own range and labels

    From 1 to 5, from 0 to 10, whatever you need. The endpoints carry your own labels, and intermediate values can be labelled too.

  • Several statements on one slide

    A list of statements, the same scale, one answer per person per statement — six questions don't need six slides.

  • Distribution and mean

    Beside the distribution sits the mean per statement, computed over the answers actually given. The spread is often more interesting than the average.

  • Skipping is an answer

    Statements can be made skippable. A skip is stored as its own outcome — distinguishable from “not answered” — and is excluded from the mean.

  • Live or on your cue

    As in every format, you decide whether the tally grows live, appears on your signal, or is collected quietly.

  • Export as spreadsheet and PDF

    Distributions and means per statement, exportable for the report afterwards — plus a shareable results link.

In practice

When a scale is the right slide

Whenever the answer is a degree rather than an either/or:

  • Retrospective: several statements about the sprint on a 1-to-5 scale — one look shows where the team agrees and where it doesn't.
  • Feedback after training: clarity, pace and practical value on the same scale, right there in the room instead of a form afterwards.
  • Agreement with proposals: before you vote, the distribution shows whether there's a majority at all.
  • Self-assessment at the start of a workshop: where does the group stand? The same statements at the end show the movement.
  • When it's about priorities rather than agreement, ranking, the 100-point allocation or the 2×2 grid fit better — and they live in the same deck.

Staying honest

No trend across sessions

omul keeps no time series: the same scale in four quarterly retros gives you four sets of results, not a curve. If you need the trend, export the sessions as spreadsheets and put them side by side. Within one session, though, a scale can be broken down by an earlier single-select question — with groups below five answers deliberately not reported.

More on privacy & self-hosting

The button nobody else explains

A skip is an answer, not a missing value

Skip a statement above: the counter under the distribution rises, the columns stay put and the mean does not move. That is exactly how the product behaves — a skip is distinguishable from never reaching the statement at all.

When it is about priorities, not agreement

Three neighbouring slide types live in the same deck. They appear here as outlines rather than demos: they have no page of their own, so they have no claim to a demonstration of their own.

  • Ranking

  • 2×2 grid

  • 100 points

Frequently asked questions about scales

How do I create a scale question?

Add a scales slide, set the numeric range and the labels for the endpoints, and write the statements underneath. Every statement on a slide shares the same scale.

Can I ask about several statements?

Yes. A scales slide carries a list of statements rated on the same scale — with one stored answer per person per statement.

Is a mean shown?

Yes, per statement and beside the distribution — computed over the answers that were actually given. Skipped statements don't count towards it.

Can participants skip a statement?

If you allow it. A skip is its own outcome, distinguishable from someone never reaching the statement, and it doesn't feed into the mean.

Does this work for NPS or a Likert scale?

You set the range and the labels yourself, so both shapes are covered — a 0-to-10 question as much as a five-point agreement scale. What omul doesn't ship is a ready-made NPS calculation with promoters and detractors: you get the distribution and the mean, and do the rest in the export.

Can I break the results down by group?

Within a session, yes: by the answers to an earlier single-select question. Groups with fewer than five answers are not reported, so that a small room doesn't make it obvious who answered what.

Try it

Ask the room how much — not just whether

One scale, several statements, a distribution that speaks for itself. No setup, no credit card, no sign-up for your audience.

No credit card · Free self-hosting · Open source (AGPLv3)